Shuffle vs Marta

Marta is a fast, keyboard-driven dual-pane file manager beloved by terminal users. Shuffle shares that speed-and-keyboard philosophy but adds GPU rendering, a fuzzy command palette, and a more visual, themeable interface.

Updated · by Jaime Guzman

The short answer

Shuffle and Marta are both free, fast, keyboard-first dual-pane file managers for macOS. Choose Shuffle if you want GPU rendering, a visual fuzzy command palette, richer built-in theming, and fully open source code; choose Marta if you prefer a minimal, config-file-driven Norton Commander-style workflow. Both are free, so trying each is low-risk.

Choose Shuffle if

People who want keyboard speed plus a polished, GPU-rendered, themeable UI and a command palette.

Choose Marta if

Minimalists who love a config-file-driven, Norton Commander-style keyboard workflow.

Shuffle vs Marta, feature by feature

FeatureShuffleMarta
PriceFreeFree
Open sourceYesClosed (free)
GPU-rendered (Metal)YesNo
Built withRust + GPUISwift
Dual-pane viewYesYes
TabsYesYes
Fuzzy command palette⌘PCommand-driven
Keyboard-first navigationYesYes
ThemingPresets + per-colorConfig-file themes
Large-directory performanceGPU-smoothFast
Apple Silicon nativeYesYes

The verdict

Marta and Shuffle are close in spirit - both are fast and keyboard-friendly. Marta leans minimal and config-driven; Shuffle adds GPU rendering, a visual command palette, and richer built-in theming while staying open source. Try both - they're both free.

Frequently asked questions

Is Shuffle like Marta?
They share a philosophy: fast, dual-pane, keyboard-first. Shuffle differs by being GPU-rendered, fully open source, and more visually themeable, with a fuzzy command palette (⌘P) as the primary way to move around.
Which is faster, Shuffle or Marta?
Both are fast and far ahead of Finder. Shuffle renders its whole UI on the GPU with Metal, which keeps scrolling and redraws smooth even in very large directories.

Compare Shuffle with more file managers